- How often
- About one audit in five
- Most common reason
- The process is not agreed yet
- You keep
- The written map
One: the volume is not there
A process that runs three times a week rarely repays a build. A template, a checklist or a saved view gets there this afternoon and costs nothing to maintain.
Two: nobody agrees what the process is
If three people describe the workflow three ways, automating it encodes one of those versions and hides the disagreement inside software. Agree the process first; the system gets cheaper and simpler as a result.
Automation does not settle an argument. It hides it.
Three: you already pay for the answer
A surprising number of requests are met by a feature in a tool the client already licenses. Nexvix checks this during the audit, because building a second version of something you own is indefensible.
Four: the work is judgement, not repetition
Pricing negotiation, clinical assessment, hiring decisions, anything with a duty of care. A system can prepare the file, gather the context and remove the admin, but the decision stays human, and if the decision is the whole job there is little left to automate.
Five: the data does not exist yet
If the system needs a signal nobody records (a reason code, an outcome, a source), the first project is to start recording it. That is a small piece of work and it makes the later system possible.
None of these five are permanent. They are all “not yet”, with a cheaper first step attached.