Skip to main content
Menu

Offers

Water damage restorationHVAC contractorsPlumbing companiesHouse cleaning companiesPet groomingDriving schools

Solutions

All solutionsAI workflow automationCustom AI agents and multi-agentic systemsAI chatbots and conversational AIVoice AI agentsComputer visionCustom web applicationsAI integration and APIsData dashboards and reportingSaaS engineering

Industries

All industriesCar dealershipsDriving schoolsEcommerce and retailHealthcare clinicsHome services and tradesPhoto and content studiosProfessional servicesAgencies and software firms

Work

Selected workBest Driving SchoolNexus Drivers EdPickClickCarpstar Anglesport

How we work

Both ways, comparedYou hire the pod (ODC)

Reference

InsightsAI buyer’s guideAI glossary

Company

Security and AI governanceAbout and leadershipCareersBook a callContact
Book an AI strategy call
CUSTOM AI

Read the document once, and let the record fill itself.

Nexvix builds vision systems on the images your operation already captures (documents, plates, stock, condition) and writes the result back to the record with a confidence score and a review path.

Book an AI strategy call See measured results
Document captureCondition reportingRecord write-backConfidence thresholds
Reading images for
Best Driving School 0.73s average response Carpstar Anglesport 35% faster replies Nexus Drivers Ed 325K+ students trained PickClick 13 workflow templates
WORKFLOW AUDIT

Somebody is retyping what the photo already says.

Licences, invoices, registration documents and condition photos arrive as images, and a person reads each one and types the contents into a form. It is slow, it is dull, and the transcription errors surface weeks later.

Book the workflow audit
Transcription

Read by eye, typed by hand

Every document is processed at human speed and human accuracy.

100%Manual transcription
Errors

Mistakes found weeks later

A mistyped number surfaces at invoicing or compliance, not at capture.

NoneValidation at capture
Consistency

Condition judged differently by each assessor

Without a scored standard, two people record the same item two ways.

0Consistent criteria
IMPLEMENTATION

Capture, read, verify.

The image is read, the fields are extracted with a confidence score, and anything below your threshold goes to a person to confirm rather than being written silently.

01Capture

From the device already in use

Phone, tablet, scanner or fixed camera. No new hardware unless the workflow audit says the current capture is not usable.

Handled by the system
02Read

Fields extracted, with a confidence score

The named fields are read from the image and scored, so the system knows what it is sure of and what it is not.

Handled by the system
03Verify

Low confidence goes to a person

Anything under your threshold is queued for confirmation. Nothing uncertain is written to the record unattended.

Decided by your team
DEMONSTRATION
SYSTEM OWNERSHIP

What Nexvix builds, named.

Scope is written before code. Each item below appears in the scope document with the systems it touches and the person who approves it.

View process
Vision

The named fields and objects

Exactly what the system reads, listed in the scope document, with the accuracy target it must meet before go-live.

Thresholds

Confidence thresholds and review queue

The score below which a result must be confirmed by a person, and the interface they confirm it in.

Write-back

Results against the record

The extracted values written to your system of record, with the source image retained for audit.

Ownership

Accuracy reporting and admin access

Ongoing accuracy against the target, plus the accounts and documentation to retrain or adjust thresholds yourself.

SYSTEM OWNERSHIP

Connected to the tools you already run on.

Capture

  • Phone and tablet cameras
  • Document scanners
  • Fixed cameras
  • Existing image archives
The devices your team already uses.

Records

  • HubSpot
  • Salesforce
  • In-house record systems
  • Document management
Extracted values written to the record.

Storage

  • S3-compatible object storage
  • Azure Blob Storage
  • On-premise file stores
Source images retained for audit.

Reporting

  • Looker Studio
  • Power BI
  • Scheduled CSV export
Accuracy against the agreed target.
MEASURED RESULTS

Measured on systems Nexvix has shipped.

6 weeks
To production
Typical implementation for a scoped single-workflow system.
33,946
Interactions handled
Recorded across deployed systems to September 2026.
26,984
Users served
Nexus Drivers Ed, bilingual platform.
The form fills itself, and we check the exceptions.

Documents are read at capture and only the uncertain ones reach a person. Client reference available on request; attribution held until permission is confirmed.

IMPLEMENTATION

Compared with the two alternatives buyers price against.

Custom system, off-the-shelf tool, in-house build
What you needCustom Nexvix systemOff-the-shelf toolIn-house build
Built around your existing workflowYesNoYes
Approval stages you defineYesNoDepends on team
Named integrations agreed before buildYesPreset connectorsDepends on team
Audit record of system and human decisionsYesNoDepends on team
You own the code, data and model accountsYesNoYes
Typical time to production6 weeks1 week, limited fit3 to 9 months
IMPLEMENTATION

Six weeks. You approve at every stage.

Clarity before code. Nexvix does not start building until the workflow, the measurable outcome and the approval points are written down and agreed.

01

Workflow audit

Nexvix maps the current process, the systems it touches and where time or leads are lost. Output is a written map, not a proposal deck.

Week 1
02

Scope and measurable outcome

One bottleneck, one target, one definition of done. If a system is not worth building, Nexvix says so at this stage.

Week 1
03

System design and approval points

The rules, the exception paths and the approval stages where a person stays in control are documented and signed off.

Week 2
04

Build and integration

The automation, the operator interface and the connections into the tools you already run on are built against the agreed scope.

Weeks 3 to 5
05

Verification against the target

The system runs against real traffic with your team reviewing output before it is trusted unattended.

Week 6
06

Handover and ownership

Documentation, admin access and the operating guide, so your team can run and change the system without Nexvix.

Week 6
WORKFLOW AUDIT

Questions buyers ask before the first call.

What accuracy can we expect?
An accuracy target is set during scoping against a sample of your real images, and the system is verified against that target before it runs unattended. Nexvix does not quote a figure before seeing the images.
What happens when it is not sure?
The result is queued for a person to confirm rather than written to the record. The confidence threshold is yours to set and to change afterwards.
Do we need new cameras?
Usually not. The workflow audit assesses whether your current capture is good enough, and says so plainly if it is not.
Can it read our specific document type?
That is what the scoping sample establishes. The named fields and document types go into the scope document, so there is no ambiguity about what the system reads.
Are the source images kept?
Yes, for audit, with retention agreed in the scope document. The extracted values and the image that produced them stay linked.
Who owns the model and the data?
You do. The system runs in infrastructure and model accounts you own, and handover includes documentation and admin access.
WORKFLOW AUDIT

Bring the workflow that is costing you the most time.

One call, thirty minutes. Nexvix maps the process, names the measurable outcome and tells you whether a system is worth building. If it is not, you will hear that instead of a proposal.

Book an AI strategy callSee measured work
A written workflow map you keep either wayA named measurable outcome, not a feature listA direct answer if the system is not worth building