Scoping and data model
Tenancy decisions, the domain model, the billing shape and the first release boundary. Two weeks, and the output is a document you could hand to any competent team.
Decided with you
Nexvix builds the product itself: multi-tenant architecture, subscription billing, the permission model, the API and the AI features, in your repositories and your cloud accounts, with no retainer required to keep it running.
Multi-tenant from day oneSubscription billingAPI and integrationsYou own itThis page is for a product with customers, subscriptions and tenants. If what you need is the interface your own team works in, that is a different page.
Custom SaaS development means building a multi-tenant software product you own and sell, with its own subscription billing, tenant isolation, permission model and self-serve onboarding, rather than configuring somebody else’s platform.
The engineering difference is not the screens. It is that every table, every query, every background job and every file path has to be tenant-aware from the first commit. Retrofitting that into a schema that assumed one customer is among the most expensive rewrites in software, and it is the single most common reason a promising product stalls at customer number twelve.
Multi-tenancy costs days at the start and months later.
Nexvix builds the whole product line: the data model, the billing, the API, the admin surface, the customer-facing application and the AI features inside it. One team, so the retrieval pipeline and the permission model are designed by people who have to make them agree.
Each item appears in the scope document with the decisions it depends on and the increment it lands in.
Tenant isolation, migration strategy and the query patterns that keep one customer’s data unreachable from another’s.
Plans, trials, seats, upgrades, proration, dunning and failed payments, on Stripe or your existing provider.
Sign-up, SSO where enterprise customers require it, organisation and role hierarchies, and an audit record per action.
The path from sign-up to first value without a sales call, which is what decides whether the product scales.
The product itself: the screens your customers pay for, responsive and accessible.
Impersonation, tenant management, usage visibility and the tooling your support team needs on day one.
Documented, versioned and rate-limited: the thing enterprise buyers ask for in month six.
Retrieval over tenant data with isolation enforced, conversational interfaces, document extraction and automation.
You can stop between increments and keep everything delivered. That constraint is what keeps scope honest on both sides.
Tenancy decisions, the domain model, the billing shape and the first release boundary. Two weeks, and the output is a document you could hand to any competent team.
Decided with youSomething working and demonstrable at the end of every increment, in your repositories, deployed to your environments.
Built by NexvixCredentials, architecture note, operating guide and a recorded walkthrough, then you change one thing yourself two weeks later without calling us.
Proven by youSame company and the same engineers, two different commercial models. The right one depends on whether you have engineering leadership to direct a team.
| Consider | Nexvix builds it | Nexvix ODC team |
|---|---|---|
| You have engineering leadership to direct daily work | Not required | Required |
| Commercial shape | Fixed scope, fixed price, staged | Monthly rate per seat, pod composed to requirement |
| Best for | A defined product to ship | An ongoing roadmap you cannot staff |
| Who sets priorities each sprint | Agreed scope document | You, continuously |
| Scales down when the roadmap pauses | Engagement ends | 30 days’ notice |
| Code, IP and cloud accounts | Yours | Yours |
Thirty minutes on the product, the tenancy model and the first release boundary. If your existing codebase is the starting point, the architecture assessment comes first and you keep it either way.