Skip to main content
Book an AI strategy call
DECISION GUIDE

Where human approval belongs.

Too many approvals and the system saves nobody any time. Too few and you cannot defend an outcome to a customer. Here is how Nexvix places them, and which three are not negotiable.

GovernanceControl
Faayez MohammadFounder and CEO, Nexvix Published September 20269 min read
Default
Every customer-facing message held
Always on
Low-confidence escalation
Never removable
Destructive and financial actions

Approval has a cost, and it is the point

Every approval converts machine time into human time. That is the trade you are making deliberately: a system that asks about everything has saved nobody anything, and one that asks about nothing will eventually do something you have to apologise for.

The design question is not how many approvals, but which ones. Place them where the cost of being wrong is high and the volume is low.

The three Nexvix designs in by default

  • Before a customer sees it: anything the system writes outward can be held for review. Most clients start with everything held and relax it as trust builds.
  • When the system is unsure: below a confidence threshold you control, the work routes to a named person with full context.
  • Before anything is deleted or paid: destructive and financial actions always require a human action. No score unlocks them.

The first is a dial, the second is always on, the third cannot be removed by us or by you. That last one is deliberate: it is the approval that protects the client from their own future enthusiasm.

Setting the confidence threshold

A threshold is a business decision dressed as a technical one. Set it high and the system escalates constantly, which feels safe and costs the saving. Set it low and it acts on weak evidence.

Nexvix starts deliberately high, measures the escalation rate for two weeks against real traffic, and then lowers it with the client watching. Tuning after launch, with data, beats guessing before it.

A threshold is a business decision wearing a technical costume.

Naming the person, not the team

An escalation to “the sales team” is an escalation to nobody. Every approval point names a role and a fallback, with a time limit and an action when the time limit passes.

This is the part clients most often want to leave vague, and the part that decides whether approvals actually happen in week eight.

Recording the decision

Every approval, override and escalation is written to the record with who, when and what changed. It costs almost nothing at build time and is the only thing that answers “why did our system do that?” six months later.

If a supplier cannot show you what the audit record contains, assume there is not one.

TAKE THIS INTO THE MEETING

What to do with this.

01

Start with everything held

Relax the dial with evidence rather than launching on trust.

Default
02

Own the threshold

You should be able to change it without a developer.

Control
03

Name a person and a fallback

With a time limit and what happens when it expires.

Ownership
04

Demand the audit record

Who approved what, when, and what changed.

Evidence
WORKFLOW AUDIT

Reading is the cheap part.

One call, thirty minutes. Nexvix maps the process, names the measurable outcome and tells you whether a system is worth building. If it is not, you will hear that instead of a proposal.

A written workflow map you keep either wayA named measurable outcome, not a feature listA direct answer if the system is not worth building